1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1994 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1994 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 1994 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ6 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3239 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2440 mm |