1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (159 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (205 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XJ6 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3239 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 159 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 299 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
| Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 189 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2620 mm |
