1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2003 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2003 Toyota Camry is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Camry. (160 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Camry.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Camry. (221 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 2003 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XJ6 | Camry |
Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3239 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 88.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2610 mm |