1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. (203 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJ6 | Alero |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3239 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 140 HP |
Torque | 299 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2720 mm |