1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (553 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (299 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XJ6 | XK |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3239 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 553 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2590 mm |