1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Because 2013 Cadillac SRX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (299 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Jaguar | Cadillac |
Model | XJ6 | SRX |
Year Released | 1990 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3239 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 359 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2807 mm |