1990 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (397 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (601 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (299 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJ6 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XJ6 | E |
Year Released | 1990 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3239 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 601 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4698 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2015 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1402 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |