1990 Jaguar XJR-11 vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR-11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 (741 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 700 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJR-11. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 (800 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 731 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJR-11 | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | XJR-11 | MK VI |
Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 741 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1360 mm |