1990 Jaguar XJR-11 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR-11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 (741 HP) has 671 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 (800 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 698 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Jaguar | MCC |
| Model | XJR-11 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 741 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 800 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1520 mm |
