1990 Jaguar XJR-11 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR-11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 (800 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 499 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJR-11 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJR-11 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2946 cc |
| Horse Power | 741 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 800 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1430 mm |
