1990 Jaguar XJR vs. 1980 Peugeot 305
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJR is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Peugeot 305. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Peugeot 305 would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1980 Peugeot 305. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1980 Peugeot 305. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 573 kg more than 1980 Peugeot 305. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Peugeot 305. (96 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Peugeot 305.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJR | 1980 Peugeot 305 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Peugeot |
| Model | XJR | 305 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3979 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 377 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 67.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1493 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2630 mm |
