1990 Jaguar XJR vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 843 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJR | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Jaguar | MCC |
| Model | XJR | Smart |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3979 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 237 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1493 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1460 mm |
