1990 Jaguar XJR vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 73 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (168 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJR | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XJR | 6 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3979 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 377 Nm | 168 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1493 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
