1990 Jaguar XJR vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 763 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Smart. (95 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jaguar XJR | 2004 MCC Smart | |
Make | Jaguar | MCC |
Model | XJR | Smart |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3979 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 377 Nm | 95 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1493 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2370 mm |