1990 Jaguar XJR vs. 2007 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2007 Mazda CX-7. (244 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda CX-7.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda CX-7. (351 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda CX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJR | 2007 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XJR | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3979 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 377 Nm | 351 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 94 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |
