1990 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 85 kg more than 2010 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C3. (245 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Citroen |
| Model | XJR | C3 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3979 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 377 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 88.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1493 kg | 1408 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2550 mm |
