1990 Jaguar XJR vs. 2012 Audi Q3
To start off, 2012 Audi Q3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2012 Audi Q3. (168 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi Q3.
Because 2012 Audi Q3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi Q3. (280 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi Q3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJR | 2012 Audi Q3 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Audi |
| Model | XJR | Q3 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3979 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 377 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
