1990 Jaguar XJS vs. 1997 Jeep Dakar
To start off, 1997 Jeep Dakar is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Dakar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJS (217 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Dakar. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Dakar.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Jeep Dakar has automatic transmission and 1990 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1990 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Jeep Dakar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jaguar XJS | 1997 Jeep Dakar | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | XJS | Dakar |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3590 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |
