1990 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1990 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 130 kg more than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1990 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Jeep Cherokee | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cherokee | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2068 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |
