1990 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6

To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki XL6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jeep Cherokee (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 5 kg more than 2000 Suzuki XL6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Suzuki XL6 (218 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Jeep Cherokee. (180 Nm). This means 2000 Suzuki XL6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Jeep Cherokee. 2000 Suzuki XL6 has automatic transmission and 1990 Jeep Cherokee has manual transmission. 1990 Jeep Cherokee will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Suzuki XL6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: