1990 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1990 Jeep Cherokee. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1990 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 137 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX.
Because 1990 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jeep Cherokee | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Jeep | Acura |
Model | Cherokee | CSX |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |