1990 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1990 Jeep Cherokee. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1990 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 1990 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Jeep Cherokee. (180 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Jeep Cherokee | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Cherokee | E-350 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 57 L |