1990 Lamborghini Diablo vs. 2004 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Lamborghini Diablo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Lamborghini Diablo would be higher. At 5,706 cc (12 cylinders), 1990 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Lamborghini Diablo (485 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 350 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2300. (135 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Lamborghini Diablo weights approximately 234 kg more than 2004 Mazda B2300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Lamborghini Diablo (580 Nm) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2300. (206 Nm). This means 1990 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Lamborghini Diablo | 2004 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Lamborghini | Mazda |
| Model | Diablo | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5706 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 485 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 580 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1366 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 27.4 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 62 L |
