1990 Lincoln Continental vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1990 Lincoln Continental is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 550 kg more than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Lincoln Continental | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Continental | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2620 mm |
