1990 Lincoln Continental vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 80 kg more than 1990 Lincoln Continental.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Lincoln Continental | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Lincoln | Ford |
Model | Continental | Ranger |
Year Released | 1990 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3010 mm |