1990 Lincoln Continental vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 60 kg more than 2002 Acura CL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Lincoln Continental | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Lincoln | Acura |
Model | Continental | CL |
Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2580 mm |