1990 Lincoln Continental vs. 2004 Ascari KZ1
To start off, 2004 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 290 kg more than 2004 Ascari KZ1.
Because 2004 Ascari KZ1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ascari KZ1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Lincoln Continental | 2004 Ascari KZ1 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Ascari |
| Model | Continental | KZ1 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 4941 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 500 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1852 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2636 mm |
