1990 Lotus Elan vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 1990 Lotus Elan is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Lotus Elan weights approximately 440 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Lotus Elan | 1953 Maserati A6GCS | |
| Make | Lotus | Maserati |
| Model | Elan | A6GCS |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 580 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2320 mm |
