1990 Lotus Elan vs. 2003 Proton 300
To start off, 2003 Proton 300 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2003 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Proton 300 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1990 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Lotus Elan | 2003 Proton 300 | |
Make | Lotus | Proton |
Model | Elan | 300 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2450 mm |