1990 Mahindra Armada vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1990 Mahindra Armada is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica.
Because 1990 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Mahindra Armada | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Celica |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4380 mm |
