1990 Mahindra Armada vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1990 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1990 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 590 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Because 1990 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Mahindra Armada | 2002 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mahindra | Renault |
| Model | Armada | Clio |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3850 mm |
