1990 Mahindra Armada vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1990 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1990 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 896 kg more than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Because 1990 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mahindra Armada | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Celica |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4340 mm |