1990 Maserati Shamal vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Maserati Shamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Maserati Shamal would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Maserati Shamal (321 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2008 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Maserati Shamal (445 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1990 Maserati Shamal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Maserati Shamal | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Maserati | Holden |
| Model | Shamal | UTE |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3217 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 445 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
