1990 Mazda 626 vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 1990 Mazda 626 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1946 Triumph 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Triumph 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mazda 626 | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 626 | 1800 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1774 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2550 mm |