1990 Mazda 626 vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1990 Mazda 626 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mazda 626 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 1990 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Mazda 626 | 1954 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Mazda | Riley |
| Model | 626 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2870 mm |
