1990 Mazda 626 vs. 1976 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1990 Mazda 626 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mazda 626 | 1976 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 626 | Ascona |
Year Released | 1990 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2530 mm |