1990 Mazda 929 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (123 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1990 Mazda 929. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1990 Mazda 929.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Mazda 929 (167 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (161 Nm). This means 1990 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mazda 929 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 929 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 91 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2610 mm |