1990 Mazda 929 vs. 2009 Audi TT

To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1990 Mazda 929. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1990 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 50 kg more than 1990 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mazda 929. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mazda 929. 2009 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1990 Mazda 929 has manual transmission. 1990 Mazda 929 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Mazda 929 2009 Audi TT
Make Mazda Audi
Model 929 TT
Year Released 1990 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1982 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 350 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 82.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98 mm 92.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.6:1 9.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1345 kg 1395 kg
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4200 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2470 mm