1990 Mazda 929 vs. 2013 Ford Escape
To start off, 2013 Ford Escape is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Escape (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1990 Mazda 929. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1990 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Escape weights approximately 253 kg more than 1990 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Escape (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mazda 929. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mazda 929. 2013 Ford Escape has automatic transmission and 1990 Mazda 929 has manual transmission. 1990 Mazda 929 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Escape will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mazda 929 | 2013 Ford Escape | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 929 | Escape |
Year Released | 1990 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4524 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2078 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2690 mm |