1990 Mazda Eunos vs. 1996 Volvo 960
To start off, 1996 Volvo 960 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda Eunos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda Eunos would be higher. At 3,924 cc, 1990 Mazda Eunos is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mazda Eunos weights approximately 100 kg more than 1996 Volvo 960.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1990 Mazda Eunos has automatic transmission and 1996 Volvo 960 has manual transmission. 1996 Volvo 960 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Mazda Eunos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Mazda Eunos | 1996 Volvo 960 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Eunos | 960 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3924 cc | 2472 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2780 mm |
