1990 Mazda Eunos vs. 1997 Volvo C70
To start off, 1997 Volvo C70 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda Eunos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda Eunos would be higher. At 3,924 cc, 1990 Mazda Eunos is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mazda Eunos weights approximately 30 kg more than 1997 Volvo C70.
Because 1990 Mazda Eunos is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Mazda Eunos. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Mazda Eunos | 1997 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Eunos | C70 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3924 cc | 2383 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 68 L |
