1990 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1997 Rover 400
To start off, 1997 Rover 400 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1990 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mazda RX-7 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1997 Rover 400. (110 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 400.
Because 1990 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Mazda RX-7 (186 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mazda RX-7 | 1997 Rover 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | RX-7 | 400 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2560 mm |