1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 vs. 1983 Toyota Model F
To start off, 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Model F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Model F. (76 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Model F.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 (153 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Model F.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 | 1983 Toyota Model F | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | 190 | Model F |
Year Released | 1990 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.2 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2240 mm |