1990 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL (228 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 520 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL (267 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | SL | 2000 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 267 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |