1990 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL. (228 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 230 kg more than 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL. (267 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mercedes-Benz SL | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | SL | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 267 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 87 L |