1990 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2006 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL (228 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi L 200. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi L 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mercedes-Benz SL | 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | SL | L 200 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 75 L |