1990 Mercury Cougar vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1990 Mercury Cougar is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 408 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mercury Cougar | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Mercury | Rover |
Model | Cougar | 2000 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |