1990 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 560 kg more than 1990 Mercury Sable.
Because 2010 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Mercury Sable | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Mercury | Dodge |
| Model | Sable | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2511 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3340 mm |
