1990 Mercury Tracer vs. 1995 Renault Clio

To start off, 1995 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mercury Tracer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mercury Tracer (88 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1995 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Tracer should accelerate faster than 1995 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mercury Tracer weights approximately 195 kg more than 1995 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Mercury Tracer (146 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Renault Clio. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1990 Mercury Tracer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Mercury Tracer 1995 Renault Clio
Make Mercury Renault
Model Tracer Clio
Year Released 1990 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1859 cc 1171 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 88 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 88 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 855 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 3710 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2680 mm