1990 Mercury Tracer vs. 2003 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2003 Mercury Sable is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercury Sable (152 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (127 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1990 Mercury Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercury Sable weights approximately 465 kg more than 1990 Mercury Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercury Sable (246 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (154 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mercury Tracer.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Mercury Tracer 2003 Mercury Sable
Make Mercury Mercury
Model Tracer Sable
Year Released 1990 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1839 cc 2982 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 127 HP 152 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 154 Nm 246 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1100 kg 1565 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 5030 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2760 mm